Korps Commander Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Of course, is the price of 5-10 dead innocent students worth it to subdue the gunner after a scuffle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 How did they attack you? With bare hands or with a weapon? bare hands, but the pecker was huge. Had me in a headlock, I whipped out my trusty little pocketknife (then called an illigal weapon by the idiot cop. The court later gave me my knife back) pushed him away and told him not to [bleeped!] with me. He ran off crying... It was actually quite funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 [bleeped!], your a girl huh? tough! (not to be sexist) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 Yes. Everybody should have provacy... And there are some subjects that your parents shouldnt know just cuz your a child Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameClaw_268 Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 In some states(like Nebraska) we don't legally own anything until we're 19. So we don't really get privacy rights.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 [bleeped!], your a girl huh? tough! (not to be sexist) I'm sorry.. where did I imply I was a girl? lol. There is DEFINITLY a penis down there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Actually, if you think about it, it depends on how old the child is, if you are going to give him/her privacy................I mean, if the kid is five years old, then of course adults have the right to "invade" the kid's privacy if they feel that they need to.................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixFlame512 Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Actually, if you think about it, it depends on how old the child is, if you are going to give him/her privacy................I mean, if the kid is five years old, then of course adults have the right to "invade" the kid's privacy if they feel that they need to.................. Then that would be an unethical invasion of privacy. Unless of course, the five year old was invading the privacy of his/her parents. But I see no other reason why a parent should nose into his/her son's/daughter's private business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 If the parents let the 5-year-old run around without being supervised and inspected, then the 5-year-old will probably grow up wild and too free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myscrnnm Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 If the parents let the 5-year-old run around without being supervised and inspected, then the 5-year-old will probably grow up wild and too free. We r talking about privacy here ****head, not supervision. U can supervise someone without invading their privacy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 Everybody should have provacy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 28, 2005 Author Share Posted April 28, 2005 [bleeped!], your a girl huh? tough! (not to be sexist) I'm sorry.. where did I imply I was a girl? lol. There is DEFINITLY a penis down there. lol, sorry, i knew you were a guy cus i could tell from previous posts, its just that the "Her" part in your name threw me off, sorry, lol yeah, i feel stupid now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixFlame512 Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 lol, sorry, i knew you were a guy cus i could tell from previous posts, its just that the "Her" part in your name threw me off, sorry, lol Before HerLoss explained his name in another post, I always thought that he was a girl as well cuz the Her in his screen name made my mind trick me into thinking that the person was a girl. Anyway, back to the topic. I support amd respect the privacy of all people who are worthy of trust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 We r talking about privacy here ****head, not supervision. U can supervise someone without invading their privacy. And I meant "supervision" as in the parents looking deeply into their child's life/belongings/etc to see if the child is going on the right path, ****head. Anyway, I don't know about anyone else, but I always knew that HerLoss was a male. There have been many occasions which HerLoss implied that he was a male............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myscrnnm Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 We r talking about privacy here ****head, not supervision. U can supervise someone without invading their privacy. And I meant "supervision" as in the parents looking deeply into their child's life/belongings/etc to see if the child is going on the right path, ****head. Anyway, I don't know about anyone else, but I always knew that HerLoss was a male. There have been many occasions which HerLoss implied that he was a male............. U weren't being specific enough ****head. And y don't u take your personal vendetta somewhere else eh? There r many occasions. But not all occasions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.