PhoenixFlame512

myscrnnm told me that you are pretty stupid. Just because you don't see my new posts doesn't mean I don't post here anymore.

368

Why would you be a criminal if you make a contribution to the community?

I saw on the news today a software called Clearplay for DVD players. Where you can choose what kind of stuff to censor on DVDs, so I guess that is on step closer to letting people choose what to watch and what not to watch.

I voted no. I mean, physical punishment should only be used in prisons, and at home. The schools should not decide how to abuse the bodies of students.

Yes, the controller was also pretty innovative for its time. But nothing could beat the Playstation, it was perhaps the most high-tech gaming platform for its time. Nope, it was the SNK Neo-Geo(I just watched that stuff on TV... yeah I know, most of you don't watch tech tv, so sue me.) IT was like, 600 bucks though... so impracticle for the home market... I was referring to mainstream gaming platforms. i.e. Nintendo N64, Sega Dreamcast, Sony Playstation.

It is a good concept. But too harsh to be accepted by most other societies. The citizens prefer boys because after a marriage, everything that previously belonged to the wife is now the possession of the boy. Also, the Chinese say that men always come first, and women last.

Nope. It was the Sega Genesis, believe it or not! Ah, a vintage collectable. I expect a museum would bid for it. I own an original Nintendo Entertainment System and a Nintendo N6 myself.

Well, it is rude and unethical, but I wouldn't say it's disgusting. I mean, regular [bleeped!] can b just as disgusting as any rape. Its disgusting in the premise that a human would force themselves upon another in order to feel good about themselves. Its a disgusting train of thought. Not if the [bleeped!] is mutual. i.e. if it is enjoyed by both of the members.

and

Ohaiyo gozaimasu! I am PhoenixFlame512.

I see no problems with it. It is a win-win situation. The would-be victims are safer, and the would-be criminals don't commit crimes. Then we have less innocent people getting killed, robbed, raped, et cetera and we also don't have to worry about jails getting overcrowded. There is no afterlife. When you're dead, you're dead. Unless of course our brains are actually particles existing outside of our bodies, but then each one would have to house a wireless transmitter to transmit signals to the brain. But since there is no natural function that allows such a thing to happen, it is impossible to live after the body has been decomposed, cremated, et cetera. So therefore, there is no afterlife.

I voted yes. Although it may be cruel since animals are living beings like us, products made from animals and with the help of animals can benefit humans. And humans are obviously the superior race.

I voted yes. Although suicide is sometimes a cowardly act, I think everyone should make their own decisions on what to do with their bodies.

much.

I didn't vote because I think it depends on what kind of minor. I mean, is it a two year old? A nine year old? It can make quite a difference. Because children can develop a sense of right and wrong in very short periods of time. In some cases, it may even depend on what the minor is like in the rest of his/her life.

Before HerLoss explained his name in another post, I always thought that he was a girl as well cuz the Her in his screen name made my mind trick me into thinking that the person was a girl. Anyway, back to the topic. I support amd respect the privacy of all people who are worthy of trust.

Hmm, it depends on what kind of censoring though. I mean, there is censoring of government stuff, and then there is the censoring of like violence, [bleeped!], drugs, humour, et cetera.

352

The Iraqis were minding their own business. But the terrorists would have killed us all if the United States had not intervened.

That is what I have always thought. Although it would be nice of us men to put down the seat after we go to the bathroom, I find it a small matter that is as trivial as an open or closed door.

I kind of understand, although I don't agree with your logic. I expect you are thinking that you will be able to be proud of your children I expect.

I expect so. The mother may have HIV/AIDS, which could be transmitted to the infant, or the mother may die from pre-known complications at the time of childbirth, or the mother may not be able to support the child, et cetera.

What are these problems of which you speak?

Yes, the controller was also pretty innovative for its time. But nothing could beat the Playstation, it was perhaps the most high-tech gaming platform for its time.