Korps Commander Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Awesomegamer, if you had read my post more carefully, you would have noticed that I never called George Bush a bad name............... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 oh sorry, thats was directed at PF512 calling you an idiot. i dint evenb notice a post about Bush till i looked back just now, because you mentioned it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Yeah, PhoenixFlame512 always is headstrong many times.................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 I would have thought that after the "war in iraq" thread he would realize that no one wanted to hear who he thought or was told was ignorant. Maybe he's a little slow, maybe not. I dont know, but I guess I was wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 getting back on topic yes. Us have absolutely no rights to tell other countries what to do. What's the so called democracy in that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 That jsut makes the world imperialistic. I'm not saying that imperialism is anything new, we've been doing it for a LONG time, but really, shouldnt there be a better way in this "civilized" world we live in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameClaw_268 Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Meh, in 1000 years, the US will take this to far, attack the last non-us country in the world(which would probably be England) and make a global government. Then aliens will come and it will start all over, until we have the galaxy, then the universe, then the next dimension, and so on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixFlame512 Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 Meh, in 1000 years, the US will take this to far, attack the last non-us country in the world(which would probably be England) and make a global government. Then aliens will come and it will start all over, until we have the galaxy, then the universe, then the next dimension, and so on. The chances of us attacking England, which might I mention is not a country but a region of the United Kingdom, are very slight. I mean, they are one of our closest allies! The chances of aliens coming to Earth are also very slight. It is also impossible for humans to survive in the next dimension. And if we spanned the universe, even at the speed of light, we would be dead before we got from one end to the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 The chances of us attacking England, which might I mention is not a country but a region of the United Kingdom, are very slight. I mean, they are one of our closest allies! The chances of aliens coming to Earth are also very slight. It is also impossible for humans to survive in the next dimension. And if we spanned the universe, even at the speed of light, we would be dead before we got from one end to the other. Well if we are going back to pointing out ignorances, I might mention that you can never reach the edge of the universe NOT because you would be dead before you got there, but because there is no measureable end, center, or anything of the sort. Space bends in a way that if you went in a straight line accross the universe you would end up right back where you started. P.S. There is no proof of a second dimention. Parrallel universes maybe, but how can you say we cant survive in the next dimention if you dont even know for a fact it exists in the first place? P.S.S. I do believe that GM_268 was elaborating and eggzagerating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myscrnnm Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 The point of "the war on terrorism" is to save lives of innocent bystanders. unfortunantly... we've killed more soldeirs and even other innocent bystanders than you can shake a stick at. But they aren't american, or they're milatery GWB/The Pentagon doesn't care. But a lot more people would b dead now if it weren't 4 our intervening, including military personnel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 how? they were quiet mindin their own business when US troops came in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I agree. I said it before and I'll say it again. Iraq, Saddam, they were never a threat to anybody. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixFlame512 Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 how? they were quiet mindin their own business when US troops came in The Iraqis were minding their own business. But the terrorists would have killed us all if the United States had not intervened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 If you mean the insurgents, then they were never fighting in Iraq until the U.S. invaded, so they couldn't possibly killed us all. And if you mean the terrorist organizations such as Al-Quaida, then there is no proof that Saddam Husseing supported them, so we had no concrete evidence to go attack Iraq. Although I AM glad that Hussein is no longer in power............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myscrnnm Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 If you mean the insurgents, then they were never fighting in Iraq until the U.S. invaded, so they couldn't possibly killed us all. And if you mean the terrorist organizations such as Al-Quaida, then there is no proof that Saddam Husseing supported them, so we had no concrete evidence to go attack Iraq. Although I AM glad that Hussein is no longer in power............ The insurgents r not the terrorists, they r a group within the group of terrorists. Nobody ever said that Hussein is, was , or will b connected with Al Quaida. Al Quaida is a whole different matter that concerns us and Osama bin Laden, it has nothing 2 do with Saddam. And c? U admitted that Saddam should not b in power. My brother and I were right the whole ****ing time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.