druser Posted March 17, 2007 Posted March 17, 2007 I've made an article about for my school. Why do you think they are doing this mission? Only against the taliban or for commercial reasons?
Helions Posted March 21, 2007 Posted March 21, 2007 have you seen the movie, Road to Guantanamo? good movie if you're interested in this type of stuff...
AverageJoe Posted March 21, 2007 Posted March 21, 2007 This is an interesting subject, as Americans we are oil hungry so war in the middle east would allow us to obtain more oil, allowing our big corporations to improve their profits. Then again they did attack us. Whether or not it was a good idea to go to war in the first place can never be proven, since you don't know the alternative outcome. Thou I i can say that the war now is a drain our nations economy, and has put in a debt that we are not sure if we can get out of. A high ranking, retired, F.B.I official has announced that we may be heading in a depression, and that our resent economic prosperity is coming to an end. Now whether this is because the growing economic of China, or the debts from the war in the middle east I'm not sure but, it is quite disturbing to know that by the time I'm an adult that America could very well be a poor nation, instead of the rich glorious nation that we know today. To find out more about our growing troubles with china visit my site here and check out my article on china.
battlelands Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 No it was not a good idea, a lot of people died! All people must live in peace worldwide! (my opinion) And even rather, all people must have a account at helionet! (just kidding)
AverageJoe Posted March 22, 2007 Posted March 22, 2007 All people must live in peace? That is far away from now my freind, as long as we have countries and conflicting beliefs there will always be war. you can see some conflicts that will arise in the future, such as Christian idiots, Cina, Meixican immigration here. Some of things are actually quite disturbing.
wwe9112 Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 I say yea but no. Yea because they knocked down our buildings and stuff..we needed to show them we are'nt wusses and we do retaliate for whats done to us.
arunsonnet Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 no.coz war always causes sufferings and brings misery.
wwe9112 Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 War is everything, sure its bad. But once again knocking down our buildings caused pain and misery as well.
karath Posted June 20, 2007 Posted June 20, 2007 Well, the UN sponsered the afghanistan fighting, and I see nothing wrong with it... I mean, UN agreed. Cant say the same about Iraq.
Ash Fohx Posted July 19, 2007 Posted July 19, 2007 Okay. This is tricky. I voted 'yes' on the poll because I believe that the mission itself was a good idea. I just think that it should have been better thought out. With our military strength, we could've been in and out much more quickly. Dragging things out like this is never a good idea.
karath Posted July 19, 2007 Posted July 19, 2007 I find that A LOT of people somehow aren't feeling friendly towards CHina... I know this is off-topic but AwesomeJoe23's topic on CHina makes me have the impression that many people feel that China is a country to be feared one day. Well, first off, CHina has not invaded anyone in History. They only fought back (right?) Anyway, back to the main topic... Afganistan was a mission to go for oil and to liberate the place... so I think we did the right thing.
AJKING Posted July 19, 2007 Posted July 19, 2007 yes and no really because yes we should fight back becuase of the bombings and no because the Americans English and Canadians are all dieing!!
NRG Posted August 6, 2007 Posted August 6, 2007 id think its a bad idiea caus e alot of little kids are diying
rod91 Posted August 6, 2007 Posted August 6, 2007 Okay. This is tricky. I voted 'yes' on the poll because I believe that the mission itself was a good idea. I just think that it should have been better thought out. With our military strength, we could've been in and out much more quickly. Dragging things out like this is never a good idea. Then again, doesn't dragging out the war allow for increased funds? I'm guessing that's what those involved are into, in any case. And for all I know, didn't the US go to war without permission from the UN?
RelaxRelapse Posted August 7, 2007 Posted August 7, 2007 Well I voted yes. We did the same thing in Vietnam. In the beginning of the war we kicked A**, but now we are just trying to keep people there safe. It's really those F***ed up suicide bombers now. We can stay there for a little bit longer or let the country kill themselves, and change back to the way they where. OR we can bomb them with a bomb filled with weed fumes and then everyone there will be happy man j/k
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now