awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Should animal tests be legal?(chemicals, products) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 It depends. If the tests are going to benefit humanity, then it is ok. If not, then animals should be used for more productive purposes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 No. Never. Animals shoudn't suffer just to benefit humans. They have rights and feelings too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameClaw_268 Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 "The weak will die off to make room for the strong." -Unknown We are stronger and use them to make us, and sometimes them, stronger. Its the way nature works, but humans feel the weak things need equal treatment. We are one messed up species. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 25, 2005 Author Share Posted April 25, 2005 but imagine some higer life form testing us to benifit them. would that be ok? sence they are stronger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 It would certainly be ok for THEM, since they are the "stronger" species. But we would feel ashamed at how we mistreated animals. Gamemaster_268, you're right. Its not uncommon for a person to be mistreating an animal, and when someone asks how he/she would like being mistreated, the person says "But that's different! I'm a human!". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameClaw_268 Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 We might think that, but it would be the natural way, We would be inferior, so therefore, we would mostly die. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I understand that it's the law of the stronger, but still is unfair. After all if we really lived in the same conditions, most likely they'll beat us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 28, 2005 Author Share Posted April 28, 2005 infereor, sounds like hitlers perfect race.. or in this case, the perfect species, humans! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhoenixFlame512 Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I voted yes. Although it may be cruel since animals are living beings like us, products made from animals and with the help of animals can benefit humans. And humans are obviously the superior race. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I agree with PH512. Humans are obviously better than animals, and need the products which animals are tested on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myscrnnm Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 I agree with PH512. Humans are obviously better than animals, and need the products which animals are tested on. What is PH512? Some sort of petition?! Anyway, I voted 4 yes, cuz we need 2 survive. And it is part of the human psyche 2 save one's own species. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 Guess he meant PF512...  Anyway, i love animals, and I hate cruelty of any kind. Why make the poor animals suffer for a new cosmetic or plus a year of living? Really, I don't want to live much. Don't want to need to depend on the others cuz I can't do things for myself. And if our ancestors didn't need half of this stuff and lives very well, why harm innocent animals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myscrnnm Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 Guess he meant PF512...  Anyway, i love animals, and I hate cruelty of any kind. Why make the poor animals suffer for a new cosmetic or plus a year of living? Really, I don't want to live much. Don't want to need to depend on the others cuz I can't do things for myself. And if our ancestors didn't need half of this stuff and lives very well, why harm innocent animals? I expect some tests can b cruel 4 the animals. But not all tests r cruel. And besides, it is survival of the smartest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 30, 2005 Share Posted April 30, 2005 It is survival of the smartest. But survival of the smartest is cruel in some cases, like using animals to test produtcs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.