awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 Poleo, only give the vaccine to thoes who could do good in life and arent worthless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Or the same with smallpox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 small pox is a bit more uncontrolable, (i think) although they have about a dozen barrels of it stored in labs which could probably wipe out more than the whole world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 If the government really cared about overpopulation, they would:Â a.) execute all murderers and people who tortured others b.) hand out tiny amounts of flu vaccine to unknowing people who don't really have a meaning in life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 c.) make use of wasteland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 I voted for yes, but only in certain cases... Like a real overpopulation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 overpopulation usually lead to poverty which is not good. less people means more stuff for everyone there, less poverty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Exactly cuz of this that I'm in favor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 But for humane reasons, it is not likely that there will be laws in many countries regarding the overpopulation crisis............... Majazac, do you support the mass killing of people in order to cut the population? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted April 24, 2005 Author Share Posted April 24, 2005 not mass killing, im not in favor, we were just saying it would stop more poverty. and it is in some countries, i said china only allows 2 children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 24, 2005 Share Posted April 24, 2005 Mass killing is okay if the people killed are not productive anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerLoss Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 I dont think that mass killings are the answer. I would say that the cutting off of medicinal items would be. That would weed out the people who arent fit to survive and keep them from passing down their weak genes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majazac Posted April 25, 2005 Share Posted April 25, 2005 I'm against mass kill... There's no need to kill the existing persons, just to control the next ones... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korps Commander Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Read "Among the Hidden" and its sequels. The book really does a good job of explaining a possible future in which parents are allowed no more than two children. If another child is born, it is sent to a governmental "institute", where it is mistreated, tortured, experimented on, or killed outright...................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameClaw_268 Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 That might actually work, or we could just use *ahem* good birth control *AHEM* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.