AverageJoe Posted March 16, 2007 Author Posted March 16, 2007 Muhahahaha my last post still beat yours. Anyways, heres mine (((((((googleplex)^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex)) Quote
MarioFan1212 Posted April 28, 2007 Posted April 28, 2007 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999, 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999, 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999, times Googleplex. xD Quote
AverageJoe Posted May 1, 2007 Author Posted May 1, 2007 LOL thats still not as big as maxes. how about while(1==1) { $number=9 + $number; echo $number; Think thats the correct sytax. Quote
Kelso Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 LOL thats still not as big as maxes. how about while(1==1) { $number=9 + $number; echo $number; Think thats the correct sytax. Probably more like this... $Number = Math.POSITIVE_INFINITY; while (true) { $Number ^ $Number ^ $Number ^ $AllPreviousNumbersPosted! } return $Number; Quote
joemama718 Posted May 6, 2007 Posted May 6, 2007 while(1==1) { $number=$number^$number; echo $number; } is that larger? cause $number is getting larger each time... Quote
AverageJoe Posted May 6, 2007 Author Posted May 6, 2007 well really they're all infinity now, but you still have to specify the value of the number variable. the while loops would go on for ever and would never stop so for most addition and multiplication it should make it infinity. Quote
Zephyrus Posted June 16, 2007 Posted June 16, 2007 In the world of Java, at least: Integer.MAX_VALUE Anything closer to positive infinity would just wrap-around. I guess this shows you how much of a computer science person I am. If you're not limiting it to computers, but math in general... and you accept expressions, I think alpha(googleplex) beats everything said currently by far. (where alpha is the single variable Ackermann function). Quote
Demi:Pulse Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 'Infinity minus one'. I'll let that sink in now. Quote
awesomegamer Posted July 17, 2007 Posted July 17, 2007 Graham. I win. And di you guys mean Googol/Googolplex? What you put referred to a company and its main office. Graham. I win. And di you guys mean Googol/Googolplex? What you put referred to a company and its main office. Quote
NRG Posted August 4, 2007 Posted August 4, 2007 99999quadrillion 9999trillion 999billion 99million 9thousand 8hundred and 7 Quote
RelaxRelapse Posted August 4, 2007 Posted August 4, 2007 Infinity - .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 I win Quote
Demi:Pulse Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 99.99~% (where ~ indicates a repeating "9" infinitely) of infinity. Quote
Amythe Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 Oops! Bit overflow! Just kidding. How about google plex factorial? To the power of google plex factorial! (Google Plex !) ^ (Google Plex !) Calculator Overflow error. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.