AverageJoe Posted March 16, 2007 Author Share Posted March 16, 2007 Muhahahaha my last post still beat yours. Anyways, heres mine (((((((googleplex)^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex))^(googleplex)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxdamantus Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 while (1 == 1){echo 9;} XD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarioFan1212 Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999, 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999, 999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999, times Googleplex. xD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AverageJoe Posted May 1, 2007 Author Share Posted May 1, 2007 LOL thats still not as big as maxes. how about while(1==1) { $number=9 + $number; echo $number; Think thats the correct sytax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelso Posted May 3, 2007 Share Posted May 3, 2007 LOL thats still not as big as maxes. how about while(1==1) { $number=9 + $number; echo $number; Think thats the correct sytax. Probably more like this... $Number = Math.POSITIVE_INFINITY; while (true) { $Number ^ $Number ^ $Number ^ $AllPreviousNumbersPosted! } return $Number; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemama718 Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 while(1==1) { $number=$number^$number; echo $number; } is that larger? cause $number is getting larger each time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AverageJoe Posted May 6, 2007 Author Share Posted May 6, 2007 well really they're all infinity now, but you still have to specify the value of the number variable. the while loops would go on for ever and would never stop so for most addition and multiplication it should make it infinity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zephyrus Posted June 16, 2007 Share Posted June 16, 2007 In the world of Java, at least: Integer.MAX_VALUE Anything closer to positive infinity would just wrap-around. I guess this shows you how much of a computer science person I am. If you're not limiting it to computers, but math in general... and you accept expressions, I think alpha(googleplex) beats everything said currently by far. (where alpha is the single variable Ackermann function). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayepen Posted June 17, 2007 Share Posted June 17, 2007 [bleeped!] you all so smart ;P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demi:Pulse Posted July 17, 2007 Share Posted July 17, 2007 'Infinity minus one'. I'll let that sink in now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesomegamer Posted July 17, 2007 Share Posted July 17, 2007 Graham. I win. And di you guys mean Googol/Googolplex? What you put referred to a company and its main office. Graham. I win. And di you guys mean Googol/Googolplex? What you put referred to a company and its main office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NRG Posted August 4, 2007 Share Posted August 4, 2007 99999quadrillion 9999trillion 999billion 99million 9thousand 8hundred and 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RelaxRelapse Posted August 4, 2007 Share Posted August 4, 2007 Infinity - .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 I win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demi:Pulse Posted August 26, 2007 Share Posted August 26, 2007 99.99~% (where ~ indicates a repeating "9" infinitely) of infinity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amythe Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 Oops! Bit overflow! Just kidding. How about google plex factorial? To the power of google plex factorial! (Google Plex !) ^ (Google Plex !) Calculator Overflow error. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.