PhoenixFlame512

Its discusting any way... After all rape is discusting

But rape is pretty much sexual intercourse. Do you find sexual intercourse to be disgusting? I certainly don't.

most of gays come from striaght families

Yes, that is true. But I believe that homosexuality is neither hereditary nor a learned trait. I think that there are just people who are randomly born like that, regardless of family history.

well i'm agains torture and in favor of death penalty to high profile criminals.

But sometimes the death penalty is too good for some criminals. I mean, in some cases it is relieving them of spending their time in a cell. For severe crimes, you just have to torture the criminals to not only give them what they deserve, but also to set an example. If you set a good example, there will be even less future crimes.

I think that the top 1000 criminals or so should be executed (no torture, please) and the bottom 5 percent of all criminals should be let go.

If they are executed painlessly, they are not getting what they deserve. You are merely relieving them of the burden of living in jail. I still say that my original idea is the most practical. The top ten to fifty percent should be tortured to death depending on the severity of their crimes and their bodies incinerated. The minor criminals (i.e. jaywalkers, et cetera as awesomegamer mentioned) should be released, but perhaps with compensations, in the case of jaywalkers and such.

I mean, no torture? You would be doing them a favour. For once, listen to reason.

And to Gamemaster_268, the electric chair is a cruel and unusual form of torture. Not to mention it is messy and inefficient.

Perhaps they want to rape somebody, only they don't want to really hurt anybody, so they rape a dead body.

 

Its still gross................

What is the corpse is freshly dead? You didn't take into account that the person may have died mere second ago. Although their body functions would not be working, it would not be something disgusting. Unless of course the person was mutilated, burned, et cetera.

Meh, in 1000 years, the US will take this to far, attack the last non-us country in the world(which would probably be England) and make a global government. Then aliens will come and it will start all over, until we have the galaxy, then the universe, then the next dimension, and so on.

The chances of us attacking England, which might I mention is not a country but a region of the United Kingdom, are very slight. I mean, they are one of our closest allies! The chances of aliens coming to Earth are also very slight. It is also impossible for humans to survive in the next dimension. And if we spanned the universe, even at the speed of light, we would be dead before we got from one end to the other.

Actually, if you think about it, it depends on how old the child is, if you are going to give him/her privacy................I mean, if the kid is five years old, then of course adults have the right to "invade" the kid's privacy if they feel that they need to..................

Then that would be an unethical invasion of privacy. Unless of course, the five year old was invading the privacy of his/her parents. But I see no other reason why a parent should nose into his/her son's/daughter's private business.

I don't know what piece of crap GFX card I have, but it sucks major monkey balls.

What exactly is a GFX card?

there has been much conflic between you two lately, please stop. its not good. settle your arguments in a PM and stop using the forums to share the hatred with evryone.

It is no conflict. It is merely a discussion.

if we have WMDs then why are we checking other countries for them? as if we are the only ones allowed with them, so selfish.

No, I believe the United Kingdom and Japan also have WMDs. And we check other countries for WMDs when we think that they may be deceptive or when we can't trust them.

USA is a greedy country, and powerful, USA is the bully. im from USA

For your information the United States is not greedy! The United States is one of the most, if not the most, philanthropic country in the world. Each year, it gives literally billions of dollars in aide to other countries around the world. It also helps countries such as Taiwan by selling weapons to them.

i nderstand now, its because the total price of a computer includes different things than just the CPU. so whats a fair deal on a CPU? if i got a good amount of money and all different types cost the same, which is likely to be the best?

Currently, $200 should get you a 3.2-4GHz Intel Pentium 4 processor with Hyper-Threading Technology. But you might want to wait it out for a few months and take a look at the new Pentium D that's coming out. So far, Acer, Dell, and Alienware have signed up with Intel to use the Pentium Ds.

Yes. If a woman doens't want the child, most likely she will mostreat him and turn him into a bad person... Or if she doesn't have conditions to raise him, she would be putting a person in the world to suffer and to increase the poverty. The rape cases I won't even discuss... Why in hell should she carry a baby that she not even enjoyed to do?

Exactly. An abortion can, in some cases, benefit both the mother and the child. So it is only moral that we allow abortions under certain circumstances.

It depends on what you mean by game. Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft don't make a lot of their own games. I mean, Sony has Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. and Microsoft Corporation has Microsoft Game Studios. But most of their games are made by Electronic Arts, Ubisoft, Atari, et cetera.

If you are talking about the consoles, I would say that Sony is the superior one now. And if you are talking about the games, I would say that Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. is the best.

the "pleasures" of [bleeped!] is what most people to know, they have to learn on their own. if someone tells them, theyll try to get that pleasure, so its best they discover it on their own, thats how i learned.

I expect so. I mean, it is easy to find out anyway.

there are health problems. health wise, a 13 year old girl could concieve a child. but she may be too small at this age. i think they should lower it to atleast 16.

I think the minimum should be 13 or so actually. At that age, most people are big enough to have a baby fit through their cervixes. It'd obviously be really painful, but possible.

I mean, woman have worked for several centuries for equality among humans, and now your teacher is telling you this @#$&?!

Its not a good fact, but women have always been considered inferior to men throughout history, except some brave women who had the courage to stand out..........................

 

Even now, women constantly hit the glass ceiling in most jobs........its sad.

It is a fact, and how can you say a fact is good or not? It just "is". But it is proven that in terms of intelligence, females are typically inferior to males. You can tell from test scores, the SAT, WASL, ITBS, et cetera. Males typically do better overall. Well, in math anyway. But math is what's really important in life, more so than reading comprehension. I mean, for instance. I went to a math competition once, and the ten finalists were all males.

yes, exactly, its good we use all these metaphors icase anyone here still doest know. (hands on, thats a good one )

thats how about 99% (percentage generated by what i think to be very likely) of people find out what it feels like. I think vergin isnt just [bleeped!], but once you break that knowlege barrier. no i havent had [bleeped!], but i know what it feels like.

I always hear people being against "underage" [bleeped!], or even [bleeped!] in all cases. But, I mean, what is wrong with [bleeped!]? There is nothing bad about it! And what is it with underage?! People should be able to decide when they want to have [bleeped!] for themselves!

well they all live in poverty and theres just alot. theres not enough room in america and its resources for them.

Well, if they are in poverty, why the @#$& don't they stop reproducing like rabbits?!

Ah, yes. Survival of the fittest...............

I disagree with you one that. I believe that it is survival of the smartest. If there is a person who can invent things that are good for humanity, and a person with arms that can crush you like a bug, which one would you rather have alive? if you have to choose one of the two.

PhoenixFlame512, most Iraquis in Iraq are against us........................

Okay, you said that my brother bases his facts on no evidence. I don't know if that is so, but I don't do that. You are ignorant. I said so myself that most people are against the Bush Administration for going to Iraq. You can tell that from my previous post. Anyway, they are against us, but wrongfully. What? They are saying, "Trying to help us? We dont need your @#$& help!"? Well, we are not trying to help them, we are trying to protect ourselves and the rest of the world. Because this terrorism, if it isn't stopped, it will spread to many more parts of the world. We are not in Iraq to stop the terrorists from killing Iraqis, we are there to stop the terrorists from killing anyone.

thats kinda grose? you think they coulkd make it quick? but if the victom suffers, what about getting back at the criminal?

Like I said, if the victim suffers, then the criminal should in turn suffer as well, if not more so.

younger age teachings? more truthful teachings? understanging of the "pleasurable feeling" that kids dont understand why [bleeped!]? this would probably help. but kids would have [bleeped!] and rape younger trying to see what it feels like. thats why mankind can , excuse me but, (another word for owner, or leader, begins with "M") + (another word for the worm on a hook when you go fishing, begins with "B") *wink* *wink*

Well, the best way is a "hands on" experience. Then they can experience it for themselves. If contraception was promoted more, then there wouldn't be all this fuss about promiscuous [bleeped!].

Well, then they could stitch your body back...........................

But still. I mean, I am one of the people aho have qualms about my body being opened after I'm dead. I just have a fear of dying naked. And then being naked after I'm dead, that is just embarrassing. While some people do not have this fear, I do.

Woah......................that's two times as worse as being raped.

 

Hey, why did you say "illegal Mexican alien" instead of just "somebody"? Are you trying to imply something here? 'Cause you're being kinda specific.........................

Well, he would deserve it.

I used that example because of my hatred for them, not to mention my brother hates them too. I mean, they already have no right to be here. And that would justify the punishment I concocted even more.

Torture? the only thing I can say to that is: Electric Chair. It kills them, and most of the time it doesn't kill them on the first shock, instead melting their eyes and causing extreme pain. I say Kill anyone who gets life, and if its as bad as murder, electric chair. Our tax dollars are going towards giving food and lodging to criminals who don't deserve to live and will be there for the rest of their long lives. I say: Electric Chair.

I suppose that would be adequate in some cases, but for the most severe crimes, not nearly good enough.

People should be allowed to buy/sell, if you're dead, you aren't in use of them, are you...?

Well, some people feel that it is wrong for a person to be mutilated against his/her will. I'm sure that if donors are promoted, then a lot more people would agree to having their organs donated and then there would be less qualms.

i think so too, that way there is no miss understanding. i mean havent you heard a child go "ewww, kissing!" and then once you learn why, beyond school reproductive teachings, you say, hey, not too bad.

Yes, if education in this country were better, then people would understand the truths of things and the movie producers could be a lot more relaxed.