AverageJoe Posted September 16, 2007 Author Posted September 16, 2007 x = infinity; while(1){ while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){for(;{x = x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^x)))))))))))};};};};};};};};};};};};}; while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){for(;{x = x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^x)))))))))))};};};};};};};};};};};};}; while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){for(;{x = x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^x)))))))))))};};};};};};};};};};};};}; while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){while(1){for(;{x = x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(x^x)))))))))))};};};};};};};};};};};};}; }; how about that!
mahdy Posted September 16, 2007 Posted September 16, 2007 Graham. I win. And di you guys mean Googol/Googolplex? What you put referred to a company and its main office. Graham. I win. And di you guys mean Googol/Googolplex? What you put referred to a company and its main office. Graham's number Graham's number, named after Ronald Graham, is often described as the largest number that has ever been seriously used in a mathematical proof. It is too large to express in scientific notation so it needs special notation (G) to write down. Graham's number is much larger than other well known large numbers such as a googol and a googolplex, and even larger than Moser's number, another well-known large number. Graham's problem Graham's number is connected to the following problem in the branch of mathematics known as Ramsey theory: Consider an n-dimensional hypercube, and connect each pair of vertices to obtain a complete graph on 2n vertices. Then colour each of the edges of this graph using only the colours red and black. What is the smallest value of n for which every possible such colouring must necessarily contain a single-coloured complete sub-graph with 4 vertices that lies in a plane? Although the solution to this problem is not yet known, Graham's number is the smallest known upper bound for it. This bound was found by Graham and B. L. Rothschild (see (GR), corollary 12). They also provided the lower bound 6, adding the qualifying understatement: "Clearly, there is some room for improvement here." In Penrose Tiles to Trapdoor Ciphers, Martin Gardner wrote, "Ramsey-theory experts believe the actual Ramsey number for this problem is probably 6, making Graham's number perhaps the worst smallest-upper-bound ever discovered." More recently Geoff Exoo of Indiana State University has shown (in 2003) that it must be at least 11 and provided evidence that it is larger.
wwe9112 Posted September 16, 2007 Posted September 16, 2007 I bet it's pie, because pie is round and never ends as is infinity; it never ends.
santa Posted September 17, 2007 Posted September 17, 2007 that is Totally of topic man... you are trying get closest- I go with math43n estimated as pi...
wwe9112 Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 I was meaning pi you dumbass. Didn't know that there was a special way of spelling for you geeks that are so good at math. ill do this. 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
santa Posted September 19, 2007 Posted September 19, 2007 lol your just jealous because I can use proper grammar and you can't. Eat that!
AverageJoe Posted September 23, 2007 Author Posted September 23, 2007 for(spam_posts = #_of_spam_posts; spam_posts <= #_of_spam_posts, spam_posts++) {} std::cout<< "times spamed: " << spam_posts;
awesomegamer Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 googolplexian : ) googol: imagine a "1" with 100 "0"s following it. googolplex: now imagine counting to the number googol and for every interger add a following "0" Just writing it out in notepad would be a file 1x10^100 bytes long, and a gigabyte is only 1x10^9 (or more appropriately 1x2^30). googolplexian Now do that same process : )
infinity Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Or you could just do Infinity-1. But my name is Infinity, so I win already. =D But infinity-1 would be infinity still, and any other equation relating to infinity would either be 0, infinity, or undefined.
Kelso Posted November 11, 2007 Posted November 11, 2007 If you live in java land, 2^31 is "infinity". Flash I think is the same. In javascript it is crashing IE.
infinity Posted November 12, 2007 Posted November 12, 2007 Rofl @ In javascript it is crashing IE. The closest number to infinity would actually equal the time spend pressing 9s or 0s on a keyboard. So the boardest person would be the closest. =\
Bob the Monkey Posted December 2, 2007 Posted December 2, 2007 I was meaning pi you dumbass. Didn't know that there was a special way of spelling for you geeks that are so good at math. ill do this. 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 You have already been outdone by the gogolplex and graham's number. I'm going for a googolplex^4 googolplexi * graham's number Also, the whole "approximating at pi" thing is rubbish. Pi isn't "round". It's a constant ffs. I will go with pi. 13.4 lol./ Holy crap learn your basic geometrical constants. 3.14159265 Now I'm going to the zoo. -indignant-
JimBOB Posted December 19, 2007 Posted December 19, 2007 Infinity -1! You know that has to be the closest number, lewl!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now