Revolution Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 Can you permit the avatar size to 100 x 100 pixels ? 64 x 64 is LOW
lappy512 Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 yes that is what i have been telling him. i increased it on KL when people asked.
awesomegamer Posted April 7, 2005 Posted April 7, 2005 whats wrong with 64x64? you guys really find the smallest thing to complain about. its just slight ly scaled down, unless you have 3 pixel text which at this ratio would become 2 pixels and unreadable, everything should llok fine. it doesnt even seem blury.
lappy512 Posted April 7, 2005 Posted April 7, 2005 no, really. 64x64 is too small, all other forums (including Krazy Letter) uses 100x100
GameClaw_268 Posted April 7, 2005 Posted April 7, 2005 most other ones, 64x64 saves alot of space, bandwith, and stops some forum errors.
lappy512 Posted April 7, 2005 Posted April 7, 2005 what bandwidth? we are hotlinking from somewhere else! and anyways, i am hotlinking a 200x200 picture, so there's no bandwidth saved!
GameClaw_268 Posted April 7, 2005 Posted April 7, 2005 his site would still have to display it, which would use some bandwith, although not as much as hosting it.
lappy512 Posted April 7, 2005 Posted April 7, 2005 no, all his site would display would be "<img="http://url/xyz.jpg"> the image is downloaded directly from the hotlink's server, eg photobucket
awesomegamer Posted April 8, 2005 Posted April 8, 2005 actually wouldnt it be <img src="http://url/xyz.jpg" /img> or <img src="http://url/xyz.jpg"></img> or is php really that different now?
HerLoss Posted April 8, 2005 Posted April 8, 2005 actually wouldnt it be <img src="http://url/xyz.jpg" /img> or <img src="http://url/xyz.jpg"></img> or is php really that different now? well first, if you dont mind my correction those are all html tags and with an image you dont need a closing tag. Last I knew you had to have it say "img scr=" to tell it where the image was at, so "img=" wouldnt work without the "scr" part to tell the source of the image. I've never tried it without "src=" so I could be wrong.
awesomegamer Posted April 8, 2005 Posted April 8, 2005 yeah, not always need a close tag but im used to writing it salong with other tags. i know that src is shor for source meaning source file... in needs to know where the files is at, the img part just sets it up to display... i think, but it needs src, just like the a (anchor) tag href... which i know what it means, just forgot.
HerLoss Posted April 8, 2005 Posted April 8, 2005 yep, but to get back on topic, I think that this goes under the catagory of dont comlain if your getting something for free, ie:http://s3.invisionfree.com/The_Aftermath/i...p?showtopic=158 I will point you there once again. lol.
awesomegamer Posted April 9, 2005 Posted April 9, 2005 yeah, why dont you just post it somewhere? and keep it there. i get off topic alot. btw: do you have MSN? send it to me in a PM if you want
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now