Jump to content

Harlequin

Members
  • Posts

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Harlequin

  1. No. There's not a god. It's stupid to believe in one, in this day and age.

     

    ok, I don't feel like being in a debate right now(partly because I'm unprepared and I'd probably be proven wrong a hundred times over without a comeback)

     

    Here is my favorite theory(it may sound familiar to some):

     

    Ok, consider this, A watch doesn't appear just out nowhere, it had to be made by a watchmaker.

    Same goes for a house, tv, internet, and all that good stuff.

    So I believe that man must have a creator for the same reasons.

     

    That's false. In your scenario, you don't say where the watchmaker came from. If everything has to be made by something else, where did your watchmaker come from?

     

    Why are you such a prick, the big bang is the most dumbest thing in the world. Come on seriously, even if there was a big bang what made the big bang happen. Heres my theory

     

    God said it and a BANG it happen!!

     

    I'm you have the right to believe what you want, but when God(Jesus) does come back for the 2nd coming, you will regret, and if your living like there is no God you better be right. I'm not a religious person, but I do pray to gods, and ask for help and thank him for where I am to day even as a 13 year old.

     

    Saying that God must exist because we don't know what made the big bang happen is a stupid thing to say. There will be no second coming, atheists are right, and you do realise you're violating part of your religion, right? You said you pray to gods. Plural. The Christian god is a jealous god, apparently. You're only meant to worship one god, and that god is him. ;)

  2. Why would any other life "probably not be as advanced as us?" What reasons do you have - if any - for thinking this? Other life could fall below us on the scale or above us.

     

    It could be single-celled organisms which will one day be as advanced as us, or multi-cellular organisms that are MORE advanced than us. The universe is liely a mix between the two. I see no logical reason why we would be the most (or least) advanced lifeforms.

     

     

  3. Yeah, I know! I wanted to hear them sing "Weasley is our King," too! I really wanted to see Fred and George's swamp, too, and the prefects thing was totally left out.

     

    They also left out the mirror that Sirius gave Harry for Christmas, and his knife, and they left out loads of scenes at the Ministry.

  4. From what I've read (and admittedly, that's not much), Barak seems to be a better candidate than that other guy.

     

    That, and if I were an American, I'd not be a Republican.

  5. Since no one has brought it to anyone's attention, this post was mad in May of this year. I think that he has made the upgrade by now. **NOT BSM'img (backseat moderating)**

     

    Look at the post date... thats a clear sign that its an old post!

     

    True, but I can still register my approval, right? I like the design.

  6. Not always. More trees = more oxygen and less CO2 but more trees in the arctic is a bad thing.

     

    The trees will confuse animals and will invade local plant-life. Many plants are found in the tundra and only there, and this is why warmer arctic isn't a good thing.

     

    So, it's not really the trees that are the problem, it;s the climate. The trees are just a secondary thing.

  7. If the Mexicans would learn English and emmigrate legally, then I see no problem with them entering America. It's bad for both them and America if they're there illegally, though - they get no benefits, can't get a proper job et cetera.

×
×
  • Create New...