Jump to content

myscrnnm

Members
  • Posts

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by myscrnnm

  1. And let me add that it was these same ambitions that brought us to taking the Americas, killing, raping, and moving the natives, enslaving humans of other races, etc.

    U r being stereotypical. Perhaps one or two people raped natives, but not all Americans r like that. Besides, people of many great nations have regrettable pasts. 4 instance, Japan once occupied China and Korea, raping and enslaving the inhabitants. And the United Kingdom once occupied India and massacred hundreds, even thousands of innocent Indians. But the world has changed, there is order now. Have u been living under a rock?

  2. What a minute. Who the heck is blinded by ignorance here?

    Don't come tell me that US have the right to rule the world cuz they don't. It inly have the power to rule itself. Other countries should worry about themselvez... That's why UN was created in first place. To have a commition of the countries.

     

    Second. It's a fact that US reasons to attack Iraq where lies. Even CIA recognized that.

     

    Third. No one invited or asked the presence of US troopes in Iraq. Now they have the moral right not to want foreigners troops on their countries. Would you like the police invadind your house for no reason and staying there? Wouldn't try at least to make them go away? And if you did that, if you called a lower or tried to make them go away, you would be considered criminal and they would satay there to watch you. Would you like that? Cuz I don't

     

    Before calls other ignorant maybe you should just make a research on internet about Iraq war, not just watch local news who are masked by the government

    The United States is powerful enough 2 "rule" the world because it established itself as world police in the past. If we have the work ethic 2 become virtually the world's most powerful country, then we should b rewarded. I mean, there r countries with people smarter than Americans, and quite a few I might add, but what many of them lack is ambition. And 2 get the power u need the ambition. And besides, u should all stop complaining, it could b a lot worse. The United States could have decided 2 nuke all of its opponents. But instead, it is the most philanthropic country in the world. The least u people could do is show a little support in return 4 what the United States has done 4 the world.

  3. PhoenixFlame512 and myscrnnm are the only people here who believe that males are superior to females, anyway. You can't reason with sexist people like that........................

    I'm not sexist. Like I said, there is evidence that proves that males r better at sports and math than females. I respect females, but the information points 2 males when talking about intelligence and physical strength. Even my physical education teacher would tell u so, it is because of the hormone differences, males typically have lots of testosterone, allowing them 2 have naturally larger muscles, that is also y males r typically bigger than females. Y males r typically more intelligent, I don't know. But we can tell how, just look at the worldwide results of standardized tests.

  4. There is no afterlife. When you're dead, you're dead. Unless of course our brains are actually particles existing outside of our bodies, but then each one would have to house a wireless transmitter to transmit signals to the brain. But since there is no natural function that allows such a thing to happen, it is impossible to live after the body has been decomposed, cremated, et cetera. So therefore, there is no afterlife.

    You can't say that. Many religions believe in an afterlife.

    I don't follow religions of any kind. Now while I try my best 2 respect people and their beliefs in the realm of religions. I myself think that it is all a bunch of [bleeped!]. Besides, this religion stuff was invented hundreds, even thousands of years ago, and back then people thought that these ideas within the religions were feasible. But now we all know the truth.

  5. We still won't be prepared. In most movies, a person being shot looks like there is a small squirt of blood coming out of his head or whatever. In real life, a shot to the head looks far more gruesome.

    Well, it depends on what kind of weapon you're using. if it is a Smith & Wesson Model 500 Magnum, your head would literally explode. If it was a Walther P99 handgun, there would b no more than a small puncture. And then there r the crossbows, I mean, there r ones with different types of arrows, as with guns as well.

  6. i got nintendo. i grew up on it, its, been here longest, and they've always had cool games.

    Well, it has a long history of video games. But the people there just don't have any creativity or innovation anymore. Ten years ago, I would have chosen a Nintendo (which I did) because of its great games. But now, I always turn 2 Sony 4 good hardware and good software.

  7. Even violence cesure should be forbidden. We have the right to know. If we don't want to see is just switch channels

    I agree with u totally on that. I mean, we need 2 know of violence and how violent it is. If one day we experience the type of violence that is censored on television, we will need 2 b prepared.

  8. But genetical or not, they should be treated as everybody else

    Yes, after all, they r human, and most of them have done nothing wrong. So I think they should b able 2 marry each other as long as they don't cause problems 2 the straight people. I mean, I know lesbians, and they r nice. Like any other human I know.

  9. Just remember that even terrible criminals are still humans. They are protected by Human Rights. And plus, torture is a thing made by dictators and terrorists.

    Biologically, terrible criminals r still human, but they r no longer human morally. And if we will go 2 the lengths 2 kill them, we might as well torture them 2 teach them a lesson while we're at it.

  10. I like Google. And sice I use Outlook and after delete the emails that I downloaded, guess that I don't have a problem

    Google sucks. its results r ridden with spyware and the searcing is unintuitive. ues A9, the best search engine in the world.

  11. Perhaps it is because HerLoss doesn't just spew insults out at people without a good reason like you do. If that is why you are fined more, then the admins have a strong point at why they did that.

    My insults merely reflect the truth of things. It is not my fault that u r all blinded by ignorance. HerLoss is the one who keeps on carrying on this personal vendetta against me. He could at least have the decency 2 take this conflict elsewhere.

  12. If u had bothered 2 read my post after the ****ing Korps Commander's, u'd find that I have evidence supporting PhoneixFlame512's claims.

    Well hold on there two [bleeped!] seconds. Look at your post time, and my post time. 3 minutes apart. Your post wasnt there when I was reading the thread and I spent my time writing a reply. Blow me.

     

    Edit:

    P.S.

    Jesus hates you.

    *sardonically* Wow! Three whole seconds apart! *sardonically*

     

    U must b a pretty slow reader. :P

     

    And no thanks, not all of us r gay.

     

    *sardonically* Oh no! Jesus hates me! What am I going 2 do?! *sardonically*

     

    U think I really give a [bleeped!] who hates me or not? Honestly, u need 2 think your retorts over b4 u post them. :P Not 2 mention I don't believe in all this religious stuff anyways, I'm no saying it's bull, but I don't follow it.

     

    btw, I'm onto u people. U fine me 4 swearing two or three times, while HerLoss is swearing almost every other post and not getting fined a single Helion. :angry:

  13. If you mean the insurgents, then they were never fighting in Iraq until the U.S. invaded, so they couldn't possibly killed us all.

     

    And if you mean the terrorist organizations such as Al-Quaida, then there is no proof that Saddam Husseing supported them, so we had no concrete evidence to go attack Iraq. Although I AM glad that Hussein is no longer in power............

    I'll agree that Huissein wasnt exactly the best person to lead a country, under any form of government, but I dont really think it was any of our buisness to go remove him from power. We all know Al-Quaida wasnt based in Iraq so thats not where the threat was. Saddam never had any sort of WMD's so he wasnt a threat either. The supposed terrorists in Iraq are just the Inurgents using terroristic forms of attack. Seriously, if I ever met you Pheonix, I'd smack you upside the head extremly hard hoping to reverse the brainwashing you have recieved from government propoganda.

    If u had bothered 2 read my post after the ****ing Korps Commander's, u'd find that I have evidence supporting PhoneixFlame512's claims.

  14. I think awesomegamer is saying that it makes sense to want a male child rather than a female, because males are proven to be more intelligent in school in most cases, and they are usually physically stronger.................

    U ****ing ****head! First u say that u don't ****ing understand, and then someone else comes up with a possible explanation, and now you're saying that u know the answer?! That is just immoral! U should go stick your head up your ****ing [bleeped!]. :angry:

  15. Problem 1: Gmail is nearly immortal

    Problem 2: Google's policies do not apply

    Problem 3: A massive potential for abuse

    Problem 4: Inappropriate ad matching

    1. If it is immortal, that is good, cuz then u don't have 2 worry about one day

    waking up and checking your email, and finding that your email service provider has disappeared.

    2. [bleeped!] is wrong with that?! Google sucks anyway! If anything, Google Gmail is better off without the regular Google policies!

    3. There is no abuse, and if there was, it can b reported.

    4. I have no qualms about ads, as I don't c any when I use Gmail.

  16. Problems as in HIV, AIDS, etc, I think.

    That is y I said that we need 2 know about not only the pleasures of [bleeped!], but also the dangers of [bleeped!]. C? Everything I say would fall into place if u bothered 2 read all of it. (This is not directed specifically at the Korps Commander, but 2 everyone who opposes me (although that is pretty much everyone except 4 my brother and myself)).

  17. If you mean the insurgents, then they were never fighting in Iraq until the U.S. invaded, so they couldn't possibly killed us all.

     

    And if you mean the terrorist organizations such as Al-Quaida, then there is no proof that Saddam Husseing supported them, so we had no concrete evidence to go attack Iraq. Although I AM glad that Hussein is no longer in power............

    The insurgents r not the terrorists, they r a group within the group of terrorists.

     

    Nobody ever said that Hussein is, was , or will b connected with Al Quaida. Al Quaida is a whole different matter that concerns us and Osama bin Laden, it has nothing 2 do with Saddam. And c? U admitted that Saddam should not b in power. My brother and I were right the whole ****ing time.

  18. We r talking about privacy here ****head, not supervision. U can supervise someone without invading their privacy.

    And I meant "supervision" as in the parents looking deeply into their child's life/belongings/etc to see if the child is going on the right path, ****head.

     

    Anyway, I don't know about anyone else, but I always knew that HerLoss was a male. There have been many occasions which HerLoss implied that he was a male.............

    U weren't being specific enough ****head. And y don't u take your personal vendetta somewhere else eh?

     

    There r many occasions. But not all occasions.

×
×
  • Create New...